Some political parties have practically embarrassed the government by seeking the cooperation of other countries for the upcoming elections. But just as diplomats are responsible for conducting unethical activities, the lack of coexistence between the conflicting political parties in Bangladesh is equally responsible. Interference in internal politics by ambassadors is unethical. Whenever the country’s politicians are out of government, they appear to foreigners with ‘complaints’. It appears that foreign ambassadors have been commenting on election management, election fairness and impartiality in view of the upcoming national parliament elections. Bangladesh will keep taking strong action and vehemently defending our national interests. They shouldn’t say things that are careless. No external forces have the right to interfere with Bangladesh’s internal affairs, which include deciding what kind of electoral system to use and what kind of democratic development path to pursue. The people of Bangladesh have rights to talk about their own internal affairs as they own to the country. But when they criticize Bangladesh’s democratic elections, high level of development, and commitment to human rights and freedoms, they come across as “preachers of democracy,” which only serves to highlight their hypocrisy and attempt to destabilize our nation and halt Bangladesh’s progress toward achieving an honorable reputation on the global stage. Some foreign nations and their powerful diplomats based in Dhaka have chosen to disregard the fact that Bangladesh’s democracy has grown and that the majority of the population wants peace and prosperity for the region. Such heinous actions should be condemned by every community that values the rule of law, and it is even our duty to prevent them from occurring. Their actions have damaged the spirit of the rule of law and are against international law. Some foreign dignitaries based in Dhaka still openly collaborate with anti-Bangladesh elements, destabilizing elements that seek to meddle in our nation’s affairs. In addition, the International Court of Justice reaffirmed non-intervention as a norm of customary international law in its ruling in 1986. They also have a duty not to interfere in the internal affairs of that state.” We oppose the politicization of human rights concerns, the application of two-tiered standards, and the interference in domestic matters of Bangladesh by those foreign nations and their allies under the guise of protecting human rights.Īrticle 41 paragraph 1 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations states in unequivocal terms: “Without prejudice to their privileges and immunities, it is the duty of all persons enjoying such privileges and immunities to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving state. Some foreign ambassadors and heads of international organizations stationed in Bangladesh have started spreading false information against the Bangladeshi government or engaging in egregious interference in its internal affairs in various ways. We invite foreigners and hold meetings with them to resolve our political disputes. Talking about a country’s internal affairs is sad and meddling. Even if he talks, it doesn’t seem to be news in any US media. The ambassador of Bangladesh appointed in Washington will certainly not talk about who will participate in the American elections, which party will follow which policy. The country will decide how the elections will be held. Elections are internal affairs of any country. Sometimes it goes beyond the bounds of diplomatic etiquette. During elections or anti-government movements in Bangladesh, the rush of foreign diplomats increases.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |